A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall in a coastal site in a very north Dublin suburb, a situation that has attracted national notice adhering to an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family house at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental considerations, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Times posting about René Collier plus the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved into a really publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development functions at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a corporation director respectively, seek out to build their spouse and children household. The case is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, in which progress pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of founded citizens. According to the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining built by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted below planning permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their scheduling authorization by developing a wall further than the boundaries in their website, resulting in an encroachment with a Distinctive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such places are subject matter to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental law. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological penalties, especially within a sensitive coastal setting for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, and that is partly designed, is in the right posture. Their authorized team has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their perspective, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal planning disputes, where by views of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial drinking water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, a picture which includes due to the fact come to be emblematic with the depth on the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they had been intended to gather visual proof with the wall’s placement relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site in the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the water during serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm water to photograph the positioning grew to become Among the most hanging descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being protected intimately through the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as readers sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read more submissions on no matter whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment from the lawful timeline.
For the core with the dispute is often a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as built, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been referred to as meticulous in his assessment of setting up documents, maps, and problems connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their action is enthusiastic by concern for environmental safety and adherence to setting up regulation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've got described their very long-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple only looking to create a family members home in accordance While using the law. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Specific Place of Conservation and say that every one will work are actually carried out based upon Skilled advice and authorised strategies. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering The ocean during a storm, do not change the fundamental information.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how organizing disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for any predicament that lots of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation between non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Periods article about René Collier famous which the businessman experienced previously been involved in community advocacy on preparing and environmental difficulties, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from incredibly diverse professional backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times and René Collier waded by waist-significant water throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both the Actual physical reality from the coastline as well as symbolic character of the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays uncertain. The court must figure out whether or not the wall as created complies with setting up permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Exclusive Space of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling problems. Nevertheless the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside along with one another lengthy following the lawful costs are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building will work at Irish Times article about René Collier the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the case lengthen further than that address. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. Additionally, it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when elementary troubles which include environmental protection and home legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains an area of organic attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of the dispute stands partially constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal questions. Whether or not it will ultimately be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely go on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.